Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice or Microsoft Word document file format.
  • The text is single-spaced with a space between paragraphs; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed at the appropriate points within the text, rather than at the end.
  • Quotations from texts of 40 words or over should be indented (i.e.placed as a separate paragraph) without quotation marks. Quotations from participants should similarly be indented if 40 words or over; they should not be in italics.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic (i.e. referencing) requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • Please ensure that you submit (upload) two copies of your article - one named, the other blind. Your blind version should be labelled clearly as 'blind' and should not include your name.

Author Guidelines

Thank you for choosing to submit your paper to the European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy.  The journal aims to be an accessible forum that advances the theory and practice of therapy and promotes practitioner orientated research.  In seeking to celebrate the qualitative values of openness, inclusiveness, creativity and respect for diversity, we welcome contributions from diverse methodological and cultural perspectives.

We accept empirical research reports (up to 9,000 words), reflective/philosophical reviews (up to 9,000 words) or short reports (1,000 words). For Empirical research reports and Short reports the use of standard headings of: 'Introduction', Literature review', 'Methodology', 'Findings' and 'Discussion' (critical evaluation of findings and methodology) are recommended but not essential. Creative presentations are welcomed.  Recommended word counts include title, abstract, tables, and references but we can be flexible. (Please discuss any variations with the Editor.)   

Once you have checked that your paper complies with the guidelines you can submit it by clicking on Submissions from the "About" menu or by clicking "Make a new submission". If you have any difficulty submitting your manuscript please contact either the Editor (Linda Finlay - email linda@lindafinlay.co.uk) or Technical Support (Tamsin Hullah - email: tamsinhullah@yahoo.co.uk). 

Given our online format, we have the space to be creative, to use photos, pictures, videos, links to online sources, and also we can offer longer endnotes and appendices.  For example, it might be helpful to provide quotations from participants and other data in the original language of the author/participants.  You are also welcome to submit your abstract in your first language as well as the one in English.

All submissions need to comply with the following:

  • The author ensures that their research has been conducted in an ethical and responsible manner with attention paid to legal requirements and relevant professional guidelines including appropriately referencing source material.
  • A separate title page with author details is attached with the following information (which will get published within the article): i. work position/ institution; ii. email address/contact details; iii. authorship declaration statement (confirming authorship and that it is all the author's work plus a statement that there are no competing interests or interests are transparently declared).
  • Two copies of the article need to be attached:  one blind copy without author/s names and a complete copy which has a separate title page.
  • The paper starts with a summarising abstract of fewer than 200 words. In the case of empirical research reports, the abstract should clearly state the research aims, methodology, findings and conclusions.
  • If the research was not originally conducted in the English language, authors are invited to submit data in the original language in an appendix. It would also be possible to include an abstract in addition to the one in English. (Being an online journal we can support these extra elements).
  • Given the practice orientation of the journal, authors are encouraged to explore critically and explicitly the relevance to, or implications for, psychotherapy practice in the paper.
  • Where possible, give the doi (the link to the online source) using any of the following formats (though try to be consistent). 
  • The author ensures that the source of all cited and reproduced material is appropriately acknowledged and adheres to the particular referencing requirements outlined in the APA Guidelines (7th edition). See: https://apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/reference-guide.pdf      (Please note that place of publication is no longer required.)
  • For example:
  •  
    • Journal article:

      Halling, S. (2002). Making phenomenology accessible to a wider audience. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 33(1), 19-38.

      Hill, H.R.M., Crowe, T.P., & Gonsalvez, C.J. (2016). Reflective dialogue in clinical supervision: A pilot study involving collaborative review of supervision videos. Psychotherapy Research, 26(3), 263–278.

      Van Manen, M. (2017). Phenomenology in its original sense. Qualitative Health Research, 27, 810-825. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732317699381

      Van Der Merwe, H., & Wetherell, M. (under review). The emotional psychologist: A qualitative investigation of norms, dilemmas and contradictions in accounts of practice. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology.

      Hamfi, A.G. (1981). The funny nature of dogs. E-journal of Applied Psychology, 2(2), 38-48. Retrieved from http://ojs.lib.swin.edu.au/index.php/fdo

      Grady, J. S., Her, M., Moreno, G., Perez, C., & Yelinek, J. (2019). Emotions in storybooks: A comparison of storybooks that represent ethnic and racial groups in the United States. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000185
    •  
    • Book:

      DeYoung, P.A. (2003). Relational psychotherapy: A primer. Brunner-Routledge. 

      Erskine, R.G., Moursund, J.P., & Trautmann, R.L. (1999). Beyond empathy: A therapy of contact-in-relationship. Taylor & Francis.

      Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.) . Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1945)

      Rowan, J., & Jacobs, M. (2002). The therapist’s use of self.  Open University Press.

      Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage.

      de Beauvoir, S. (1989). The second sex. (H.M. Parshley, Trans.).  Vintage Books. (Originally published 1949) 
    •  
    • Brown, L. S. (2018). Feminist therapy (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000092-000
    •  
    • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
    •  
    • Chapter:

      Wertz, F.J. (1985). Methods and findings in an empirical analysis of "being criminally victimized". In A. Giorgi (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 155-216). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

      Richardson, L., & St. Pierre, E.A. (2018). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N.K. Denzin, & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). (pp. 818-838).  Sage Publications.

      Wertz, F.J. (1985). Methods and findings in an empirical analysis of "being criminally victimized". In A. Giorgi (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 155-216). Duquesne University Press.

    • Edited book:

      Giorgi, A. (Ed.), Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 155-216). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Travis, C. B., White, J. W., Cook, S. L., & Wyche, K. F. (Eds.). (2018). APA handbook of the psychology of women: Vol. 2. Perspectives on women’s private and public lives. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000060-000

      Translated book:

      Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.).  Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1945)

    • Buber, M. (1965). Between man and man. (R.G. Smith, Trans.). The Macmillan.            (Original essays written 1925-38 and published 1947)

    • Webpage:

      Victoria Transcultural Mental Health (2017). Working with Interpreters: A resource for service providers engaging with interpreters in transcultural situations. Retrieved from http://www.vtmh-workingwithinterpreters.online/

    • Newspaper article: 
    • Tóibín, C. (2016, January 22). How I wrote Nora Webster. The Guardian, Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/jan/22/guardian-book-colm-toibin-how-i-wrote-nora-webster/
    •  
    • Dissertation
    • Zambrano-Vazquez, L. (2016). The interaction of state and trait worry on response monitoring in those with worry and obsessive-compulsive symptoms [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona]. UA Campus Repository. https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/620615
    •  
    • Harris, L. (2014). Instructional leadership perceptions and practices of elementary school leaders [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Virginia.

Review Process

First Submit Your Article - You should upload both a named copy and a blind copy (which is clearly labelled 'blind' and does not have your name on it (or you give consent to your identity being known). The Editor (or Co-Editor) will then send the article to appropriate members of the review panel for a blind review (where possible) by two or three reviewers. (In other words, where possible, a double-blind review process is normally undertaken where author and reviewer names are hidden). When review comments have been sent back, the Editor will return these review comments to you (anonymously). Comments will aim to offer supportive guidance and suggesting relevant edits if publication is recommended (without changes or with minor or major edits requested).

Decisions to publish will be based on the paper’s relevance, quality, originality, interest and clarity given the remit and readership of the journal.  Reviewers will consider if the research methodology adopted is appropriate and whether the author/s demonstrate sufficient critical thinking, rigour, trustworthiness, and reflexivity. They might also comment on the clarity of the writing and/or suggest further attention is paid to ensure APA referencing guidelines have been consistently followed.

Peer-reviewed journals rely on the support they receive from the scholarly/professional community. Journals like our European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy would not be able to function without the support, dedication and conscientiousness those who share their time and expertise to act as reviewers for submitted manuscripts. We are grateful for the support received and thank both peer reviewers and members of the Editorial Board for contributing and ensuring the quality of submissions.  

 

Production process

Once a manuscript has been accepted for publication, the Editor will engage in further rounds of editing and will send edit suggestions to the author.  In addition to responding to these edits, the author should suggest around 5 key words and supply an author's biography of approximately 50-100 words ('About the author').

When the manuscript is complete, the article is formatted and these proofs are once more returned to the author for review and any further corrections.  While the manuscript is in production, the author can cite the paper as being (In Press). 

 

Publication Ethics

The European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy (EJQRP) aims to be an accessible forum that advances the theory and practice of therapy and promotes practitioner orientated research.  In seeking to celebrate the qualitative values of openness, inclusiveness, creativity, and respect for diversity, EJQRP welcomes contributions from diverse methodological and cultural perspectives.

Manuscripts will be accepted/rejected based on their quality, interest, and suitability for readers. Papers submitted to the EJQRP will be reviewed by appropriate Editorial Board members or other relevant peer reviewers. The Editor/Co-Editors will decide which reviewers are most appropriate when sending particular manuscripts out for review.  Blind copies of manuscripts will be sent to reviewers whenever possible and reviewer comments will remain anonymous to ensure a fair, double-blind review process. 

The Journal Editor (and possibly a selected Co-Editor) is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).  It is expected that the EJQRP operates within COPE guidelines embracing relevant ethical/legal frameworks. 

An Editor (and Co-Editors where relevant) will:

  1. Follow COPE core practices and guidelines.
  2. Ensure EJQRP maintains a reputation for ethical standards and fair/supportive processes and that authors/reviewers or Board members are able to raise any points of concern about journal processes or specific articles.
  3. Ensure that Editorials are balanced and informative rather than being polemical.
  4. Ensure articles submitted to the journal demonstrate methodological integrity and meet appropriate professional ethical standards.
  5. Be even-handed, timely, consistent, and fair in any editorial decision-making ensuring manuscripts are judged on their merit without regard to sex, gender, race, ethnicity, author seniority or affiliation.
  6. Try to ensure all authors and reviews are given encouragement and constructive advice where relevant.
  7. Ensure, as far as possible, that intellectual property is maintained and that papers meet ethical standards on authorship and referencing including being alert to potential abuses re: citation manipulation.
  8. Ensure authors declare any competing interests and sources of funding.
  9. Maintain confidentiality of author/reviewer identity and that of any other person involved in the process of investigating an ethical query.
  10. Try to provide a positive experience for all authors/reviewers contributing to the journal.
  11. Ensure data protection regulations (GDPR) are complied with. The names and email addresses supplied to the Journal will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of EJQRP and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party without permission.
  12. Ensure Co-Editors take responsibility for the peer review process and editorial decisions for any papers (other than the Editorials) authored by the Editor or where competing interests may be involved.
  13. As EJQRP is an online journal, corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies can be promptly offered and, where relevant/necessary, and corrected copies of the article can  be uploaded replacing the incorrect version.

 

Copyright

The copyright of content in the European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the Journal. Journal articles are published as Open Access under a Creative Commons License which allows free download and use of the articles with appropriate attribution (to both the author and European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy) for educational and other non-commercial use.

Electronic back-up and preservation of access to the journal content is assured by the Online Journal System.

Privacy Statement

 
Data protection: The names and email addresses supplied to the Journal will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this Journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party without permission.